Talking Back to the Cold War: Dissenting Voices, 1945-1989
  • Home
  • About
  • 1940s
    • Orwell, "You and the Atomic Bomb," 1945
    • Hartford Courant, "Are We Afraid of Freedom?"
  • 1950s
    • William Faulkner, "Nobel Prize Speech," 1950
    • Dwight Eisenhower, "Costs of War Speech," 1953
    • Jawaharlal Nehru, "Speech at Bandung," 1955
    • Nikita Khrushchev, "The Secret Speech," 1956
    • Imre Nagy, "Broadcast Message," 1959
  • 1960s
    • Dwight Eisenhower, "Farewell Address," 1961
    • David Low, "Advisers and Consenters," 1962
    • Students for a Democratic Society, "Port Huron Statement," 1962
    • Bob Dylan, "Masters of War," 1963
    • Kwame Nkrumah, "Letter to Lyndon Johnson," 1964
    • Martin Luther King, Jr., "Speech to Antiwar Clergy," 1967
  • 1970s
    • Senator Frank Church, "An Investigation of U.S. Methods," 1975
    • Jimmy Carter, "Speech at Notre Dame University," 1977
    • Vaclav Havel, "The Power of the Powerless," 1978
    • Herblock, "Who's in Charge Here?," 1979
  • 1980s
    • U.S. Catholic Bishops, "The Challenge of Peace," 1983
    • "The Solidarity Program," 1981
    • Fang Lizhi, "Democracy, Reform, and Modernization," 1986
    • Ukrainian Helsinki Union, "Atomic Evil Out of Ukraine!," 1988
    • Mikhail Gorbachev, "Speech to the UN General Assembly," 1988
  • Author and Feedback

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 1977

Image Source

First Document
Though it didn’t feel like it by the 1970s, the United States was still powerful, still transformed institutionally by the Cold War--but now deeply cynical about authority. American disunity of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was back by the 1970s, with its contours transformed and deepened by Cold War exigencies and outcomes. Dissent was everywhere, and postwar consensus a distant memory. Important milestones in disarmament and cross-cultural understanding marked the detente period of the late 1960s and 1970s, and China’s diplomatic moves disrupted the balance of East vs. West. In addition, the two self-inflicted wounds of Vietnam, for the US, and Afghanistan, for the USSR, along with systemic global changes, slowly unraveled the bipolar world. 

As historian Thomas Blanton has explained, changes that challenged the top-down, two-state system included the information revolution, the rise of grassroots movements in key places like Poland, and the economic globalization that was slowly, then all at once, transforming lives throughout Asia, especially in China after 1978. In addition, developments in the Middle East challenged both the Soviet Union and the United States, from the instability of oil prices to the growing threat of violent terrorism--to the Soviet Union's failed conquest of Afghanistan, and the United States' disastrous role in the Iranian Revolution of 1979.







Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.